fysigunkus | jay hathaway dot com

Jacked Up

February 7, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Flickr Photo Download_ Jack in the Box.jpg

I don’t usually put on my graphic designer hat to write this blog, but tonight, the power of fast food compels me. While eating at a Jack in the Box for the first time since college, I spotted a history of the company logo on a placemat. The old logos had character! More than that, they actually had — get this — Jacks-in-the-Box! Somewhere between 1951 and today, Jack in the Box managed to pretty much screw the pooch when it comes to corporate identity.

Problem number one: I had no idea Jack in the Box had even changed its logo. A quick trip to Google reveals that the current abomination has been in play since late 2008. The exterior signage of the locations in my area hasn’t been changed, so this new logo was effectively invisible to me until I found myself craving a patty melt … more than a year later.

Problem number two: This logo suffers from severe multiple personality disorder. We’re not talking about mild, real-life, DSM-IV multiple personalities, either. This is a case of played-by-Jim-Carrey-in-the-movie-version multiple personalities.

The friendly, red six-sided figure and the inviting, old-school script evoke the kind of neighborhood hamburger joint my parents probably visited when they got good grades in elementary school. So far, so good. Then we come to the type for “in the box,” which blatantly aims for cool and contemporary. If the script “Jack” is 1962, the squarish sans serif “in the box” is 2002. It’s less Jack in the Box, more Jack in the XBox.

Conclusion? Jack in the Box has no idea what it really wants to be. Sure, they’ve got the cheeky spokes-clown who’s supposed to signal that they’re less stuffy than other burger places, but he’s asking you to believe a very 1950s proposition: that you should buy these burgers because they’re actually pretty good.

Whatever my feelings about Jack in the Box’s food (for the record: a Sourdough Jack, once a year, tops), the typography doesn’t lie. Jack’s a total schizo, and the dude needs to get his act together.

On this count, I can’t blame Duffy & Partners, the designers of the new identity. The brief they were working with asked for something more in line with the mascot, Jack Box. They delivered the design the client wanted, but because Jack is all over the place, so is the logo.

jackfail1.jpg

Essential reading if you’re curious about this sort of thing:

  • Underconsideration’s branding blog, Brand New, on the new Jack in the Box logo. They’ve even got some images from Duffy & Partners.
  • Bnet’s Jim Edwards is also not a fan of the new logo.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: inspiration
Tagged: , , , , ,

How We Roll

February 1, 2010 · Leave a Comment

howweroll.jpg

“Prisons can restrict the rights of inmates to nerd out, a federal appeals court has found.”

That’s not the opener for a Cory Doctorow screed on BoingBoing. It’s the first sentence of a New York Times story about Kevin T. Singer, a prisoner and fantasy role-playing aficionado who’s serving out a life sentence in a maximum-security facility in Nowhere, Wisconsin. Kevin has been into Dungeons and Dragons “since childhood,” so when the prison confiscated his books and dice back in 2004, he sued. An appeals court finally decided the case last week, ruling against Kevin and gaming.

The thing is, Kevin isn’t necessarily the ideal spokesmodel for tabletop roleplaying. The reason he’s in prison for life has nothing to do with anti-nerd undercurrents in society, and everything to do with bludgeoning his brother-in-law to death with a sledgehammer. Wisconsin led the charge to abolish the death penalty 150 years ago, and any state employee who’s bitter about that can only hurt a guy like Kevin by taking away everything that keeps him going while he serves out the rest of his days. Unfortunately, in their haste to punish a killer, Wisconsin officials threw a pretty great game under the bus.

Life is a long time for a guy in his early 30s, and it’s even longer when the guards take away your favorite mental escape because they think it might inspire a physical escape attempt. On top of alleging that gaming might cause a prisoner to go all Count of Monte Cristo, the state also brought in a gang specialist, who somehow managed to keep a straight face while connecting Dungeons & Dragons to dangerous gang activity. If by “gang activity,” you mean “cooperative play,” or “Fun-yuns,” then okay. But if you actually mean “gang activity,” give me a break.

It’s been a good 30 years since the peak of anti-D&D hysteria. Back in the ’80s, Dungeons & Dragons was accused of causing everything from Satanism to suicide. The poster child for that period in the game’s history was James Dallas Egbert, III, a teen prodigy whose disappearance and subsequent death were blamed on D&D in the media, even though gaming had nothing to do with his depression. [See the timeline after the jump for a brief history of ass-backwards anti-gaming mania.]

pennyarcadeprison.jpg

This prison fiasco doesn’t have to mean a return to the bad old days. Even though Kevin doesn’t offer the most sympathetic face you could hope to put on the game, there are still some gleaming role models out there, reminding the world that tabletop role-playing geeks aren’t all violent or clinically depressed. You don’t have to look any further than the guys who just did a hilarious comic strip about the prison D&D ban: Penny Arcade’s Gabe and Tycho.

The Penny Arcade guys are leading by example by starring in the official D&D podcast, along with another prominent webcomics artist, PVP’s Scott Kurtz. Even better, they’ve got actor/author/poster-geek Wil Wheaton on board. It’s one thing to make jokes and hyperbolic accusations about D&D, but it’s another thing entirely to hear it played by a bunch of the nicest, most entertaining guys around. It puts a more fun, less sledgehammer-murdery spin on the whole thing.

So, here’s to our contemporary geek heroes. Thanks for showing everyone how you roll.

[dice photo: ciroduran]

Keep reading →

→ Leave a CommentCategories: entertainment
Tagged: , , , , ,

Welcome to the Pie Decade

January 17, 2010 · 1 Comment

piedecade.jpg

The New York Times recently ran a piece about the increasing speed of generation gaps. Because life-changing gadgets have much speedier development cycles than they did when I grew up, sociologists think people in their twenties have become the new out-of-touch grownups. Apparently, someone 5 years my junior relies a lot less on email and a lot more on IMs than I do, and that makes me a prematurely-old curmudgeon. A Pew researcher quoted in the article explains that “[c]ollege students scratch their heads at what their high school siblings are doing, and they scratch their heads at their younger siblings. It has sped up generational differences.”

Fellow twenty-somethings, we have apparently passed our expiration date.

But wait! While I was sipping Ovaltine in my rocking chair and passing out some delicious Werther’s Originals, I happened on another article. The Philadephia Inquirer asked kids between 7 and 13 to predict what significant developments this new decade might bring. Great! Another chance to feel old! Surely these intrepid junior futurists would hold expectations far beyond anything my senile 26-year-old brain could make sense of. I pushed back my fears, put on my glasses-on-a-chain and started to read.

The article shocked me, but not because kids born in the ’90s are growing up as unfathomable cyborgs. On the contrary, my 7-year-old self would have made the same totally awesome predictions these kids did. The overwhelming concern for the well-being of animals, the robot monkey butlers, and the hope for an end to divorce are straight out of my childhood. Unrelatable? Hardly.

Sure, maybe the iGeneration will one day process my remains into fuel for their jetpacks, but we still get excited by the same fascinating stuff. I’d like to add my endorsement to this prediction by Marly, age 8: “Chefs may create new recipes, such as new flavors of pie.”

Some things are so timelessly cool that every effort to explain their appeal using grown-up language comes off as overly-academic and weird. You can try to translate that feeling in every kid’s gut into studies and essays, but they’re never going to be as exciting as dinosaurs and robots. Attempts to analyze the magic are dated before they’re ever finished, but pie will never lose its relevance. Just be cool, okay? I think you’ll find you still know how.

Welcome to the Pie Decade.

[Photo: varktherebel]

→ 1 CommentCategories: inspiration
Tagged: , , ,

Cold Content Farm

December 14, 2009 · 14 Comments

winterfarm-1.jpg

It’s more reliable than any bus in town.

“What do you do?”

Me, I write. Constantly. Nights, weekends. If I am not currently holding a drink and being asked what I do, I’m writing. So I say, “Me? I write.”

Then comes the look. I’m hoping for a little interest, somewhere around the corners of the mouth. A quick chorus-line kick of the eyebrow will do. That’ll get me going, because it lets me know you love words, and I absolutely must know which words you love. I’m hoping we can do the dance of giddy reminiscence, about novels, about stories and, hell, even about blogs. It’s one of my favorite dances.

Lately, it’s been the other look that shows up more often. The rolling eyes, the slumping shoulders, the scan around the room for someone in a respectable profession. Now we’re doing another dance altogether. Now you’re stepping on my feet. Now you’re asking me, “Oh, so you do content?

Content: that most formless, most beige, most indifferent of nouns. You’re comfortable with “content,” because what’s actually contained is irrelevant to you. You don’t wonder whether it’s writing, because you don’t intend to read it. You don’t care whether anyone else reads it, either. Words aren’t for reading; they’re for indexing, clicking on, optimizing. They fill that space under the banner and left of the text ads. They’re not even fast food, they’re bot fodder.

Perhaps there’s good money to be made shunting keywords around, writing articles that aren’t meant to be read, but that’s money I’m leaving on the table. I want to write something honest, something inexpert, something search-engine-unoptimized. I want to write what makes me hurt, what gets me off, what gets me out of bed every morning, and what makes me stay longer than I should. I want writing with skinned knees.

You want me to sell advertising.

Do you know how many keyword-grinding, content-farming replicants it takes to equal a Gruber or a Rands? How about a Haruki Murakami? Trick question. When Murakami describes the pleasures of owning a perfect sofa, or when Rands explains how geeks approach games, they’re not writing for a teeming nest of Google spiders. Writers don’t “create content,” they fucking write. What’s contained does matter to them. The right words matter. Not the keywords, not acai berries or vacuum cleaners or whatever the ad people can “monetize” today. Sometimes, the right words keep them up nights.

You may be a writer if: the right words keep you up nights.

I’m not Murakami, I’m painfully certain. I’m not Faulkner or Kerouac or Gruber or Rands or Mark riverboatin’ Twain. Everyone’s got stories, though, and I’m thrilled and terrified at the possibility that I might have it in me to tell one deftly and honestly. You advise me against that, though, because it probably wouldn’t be good for my pagerank, and you’re not sure how I intend to profit from these messy aspirations of mine.

I’m not sure, either, but I promise I won’t do it by leaving the web — or the print publishing world, for that matter — worse than I found it. Resolved, then, as I look away and pretend to be infinitely fascinated by the way the light hits my glass: I will keep working to get better at what I do. I will keep losing sleep, keep looking for the right words, keep reading real writing. I will stick by the people who love a good story. Life’s too short to dance with ad hucksters, get-rich-quickers, bot-feeders and human acronyms.

“Oh, so you do content?”

No.

[Photo: James Jordan]

→ 14 CommentsCategories: inspiration
Tagged: , , ,

Two New Interviews

December 10, 2009 · Leave a Comment

It’s been a while, but I’ve got some new interviews up for your reading pleasure.

editorsint.jpg

Most recently, I chatted with Russell Leetch, bassist of Editors. Editors have a lovely, dark, synth-heavy new album out, called In This Light and On This Evening. It recently spent a little time as the #1 album in the UK. So, when the #1 album in the UK meets the #1 interviewer in my half of this duplex, here’s what you get:

JH: So, you all had to sing on this album …

RL: Yeah, on the backing vocals. Flood [Producer Mark "Flood" Ellis] made us! He was like, “So, Tom does all the backing vocals?” and we were like, “Well, yeah, ’cause he can sing the best.” He said, “Well, you all sing in tune, and it’ll sound like someone else’s voice. That’s what you want for the backing vocals.” When we started singing, we’d be laughing and going “We are really bad at this!” But the Boxer vocals are from all four of us, and they sound quite nice and eerie. It was opening us up to the fact that being a bit shit can be to your advantage.

linehanint.jpg

A little bit before that, I got another chance to do The Morning News’ excellent TMN Talks series, which involves drawing from TMN’s in-house collection of very interesting questions. I corresponded with Graham Linehan, writer of some of my favorite TV comedies, including Father Ted, Black Books and The IT Crowd.

TMN: Have you done or considered doing stand-up?

GL: I have. Didn’t go well. Twitter is a much better stage for me. I think through my fingers.

Thanks for indulging me. There should be more to come quite soon.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: press
Tagged: , , , , ,

My Tumblr Top 10 for 2009

November 23, 2009 · 2 Comments

You may have noticed that I have a dumb little side-blog over on Tumblr, called Film Noir Tagline. Much of the time, it’s just pictures of pretty girls in pretty outfits, but I throw in some design porn, music, and assorted Internet ephemera I find funny or inspiring.

Much like my Twitter account, this whole Tumblr thing is taking its time to evolve. I promise you don’t want to see what I posted to Twitter before I started using it for wisecracks, puns and dick jokes. At the same time, I’m sure the current state of Film Noir Tagline will seem shabby to me once it finally decides what it wants to be when it grows up.

For now, though, I’m going to use it as another excuse to continue looking back on 2009. We’ll laugh, we’ll love, we’ll cry and maybe we’ll even learn something. Here are the 10 most liked/reblogged bits from my Tumblr this year:

#10: “At The Tweetup

atthetweetup.jpg

This was a recounting of a befuddling conversation I had with an otherwise very lovely search-engine marketing expert. She changed the subject to cheese shortly afterward, and everything was fine. I may respond to anything marketing-related with a vacant, watery stare, but goddamn, I love cheese.

#9: “Single Ladies Dance to MC Frontalot

My pal MC Frontalot wrote a clever rap called Tongue-Clucking Grammarian, about punctuation, onomatopoeia, and other topics dear to my heart. Someone mashed it up with Beyonce’s Fosse-lized dance routine from Single Ladies to create what Kanye West would surely agree is one of the best videos of all time. Of all time.

Keep reading →

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

What To Do Now That The Mad Men Season Has Ended

November 13, 2009 · Leave a Comment

madmen3.jpg

 

I adore Mad Men, and I’ve followed it fervently throughout its three seasons. Sure, the show’s had its highs and lows, but it remains one of the most consistently exciting hours on TV. So, what to do, now that season three has ended? Where to look for our weekly dose of classic sartorial splendor, rapacious ad agency maneuverings and domestic ennui? Hell, what to do with an extra hour on Sunday night?

For starters, you could read back through Slate’s coverage of Mad Men season three. The ongoing conversation among Julia Turner, John Swansburg and Patrick Radden Keefe offers three fresh sets of eyes on the season’s events. It’s fun to start from the beginning and re-experience all that speculation, elation and disappointment anew. The Slate Crew also made plenty of predictions, both astute and far off the mark, and it’s amusing to read them when you already know which is which. Finally, read it for the details. It turns out I missed quite a few subtle points that add interest to the antics at old Sterling Coop, but Julia, John and Patrick picked up on plenty of them (with a little help from Slate readers). Highly recommended.

I’ll say this three times, though: spoiler warning, spoiler warning, spoiler warning. Don’t read the commentary for episodes you haven’t seen, unless you’re comfortable knowing what happens.

If you’re part of the legion of Mad Men fans who watch the show for its impeccable styling choices, you can get your men’s clothing fix from a new web show I’ve been meaning to tell you about:

putthison.jpg

It’s called Put This On, and it’s produced and hosted by Jesse “The Sound of Young America” Thorn and Adam “Lonelysandwich” Lisagor. You might think these two wisecrackers wouldn’t take clothes seriously, but you’d be wrong. Jesse and Adam explore menswear from the basics to the finer points in lovingly-produced 10-minute videos. The first episode covers denim, with a visit to an old-school jeans shop. More episodes are forthcoming — you can support their first six-episode season via Kickstarter — but for right now, fashion tips and snappy clothing finds abound at the Put This On blog.

No TV show with new episodes still airing can fill the Mad Men gap, but I’m enjoying the heck out of Nathan Fillion’s performances in Castle. It seems that somewhere between seasons 1 and 2, the writers figured out that the show works better as a comedy and a showcase for Fillion than an actual crime drama. It’s fun stuff.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: entertainment
Tagged: , , , , , ,

This Week #25

November 9, 2009 · Leave a Comment

mollyrumpus.jpg

 

The Rumpus

This week, I’m extremely flattered to see my interview with superb artist and burlesque visionary Molly Crabapple published on The Rumpus. The Rumpus is a top-notch site, and a quick browse through the contributor bios reveals that I’m in some pretty intimidating company indeed. Thanks, Molly. Thanks, Rumpus.

BOATband.jpg

 

BOAT

I also happened to catch an extraordinary local band known as BOAT playing a quirky in-store gig at Sonic Boom Records. Dear BOAT, please continue writing songs that appear to be some sort of first draft of my biography. In exchange, I will tell both of my readers to buy your excellent new album, Setting the Paces, and to listen to the charming first single(?) from the record, Lately. Love, Jay.

Elsewhere on the Internet …

Not only is Brendan McGinley a handsome and talented comics creator — who happened to call me the future voice of a generation, lord help us — he’s also a funny, funny man. He’s been writing some wicked stuff for Cracked lately, including their definitive guides to Comic Books and Kristen Bell.

Kieron Gillen and Jamie McKelvie have some comics coming out this Wednesday. The long-awaited Phonogram #5 finally arrives, as does Gillen’s debut issue of S.W.O.R.D., which he takes over from no less a righteous dude than Joss Whedon.

Musical Interlude

Music Go Music – Warm in the Shadows

I couldn’t help watching all 9 minutes of Music Go Music’s video for Warm in the Shadows. The song is gorgeous, lead singer Gala Bell is mesmerizing, and I love the premise for the video. It’s part of Music Go Music’s series of  live performances from a fictional, low-budget ’70s-style music show called Face Time. All four are worth checking out.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: thisweek

2009 in Music Videos: A Top 11 List

November 6, 2009 · 2 Comments

bestmvs09

The time to stay up all night cobbling together year-end lists and reflections approaches, and I’m resolved to get a jump on it this time. For 2009, I found that music videos were the easiest category of media stuff with which to play favorites, so that’s where I’ll start.

Since my lists often end up skewing heavily toward the most recent stuff I’ve loved, I’ve organized this one by month, creating a sort of video timeline for the year.

For your consideration, then:

January:

Asobi Seksu – Me And Mary

More design than music video, really.

February:

The Presets – If I Know You

Forget Beyonce. Year’s best dance video.

Keep reading →

→ 2 CommentsCategories: music
Tagged: , , , ,

The Social Networking Detox Experiment, Part 2

November 4, 2009 · Leave a Comment

This piece originally appeared on Task.fm’s Task Blog, where I conduct twice-weekly examinations of the ways I’m completely unproductive, and then tell other people not to be like me.
blindfolded.jpg

Having just emerged from a frustrating week without social networking — no Facebook, no Twitter, no Tumblr … heck, not even MySpace! — I  took some time off this morning to think about what I learned from the experience.

Basically, shutting myself off from the world can’t force me to get more done. There are plenty of other distractions out there, and I’m going to find them when I don’t feel like working. Sure, I didn’t waste any time reading Twitter this week, but I did watch the entire first season of Torchwood.

My takeaway is that social sites are no worse than any other favorite distraction. It’s okay for them to be part of your life — a big part, even —as long as you manage the amount of time you spend and don’t let them interfere with work.

Here’s my best advice on how to allow work and Facebook to peacefully coexist:

Don’t Go Cold Turkey

I can’t recommend completely quitting your social networks as a way to increase your productivity. If you’re a compulsive Facebook checker, thinking about loading up your News Feed can be just as distracting as actually doing it. Allow yourself a few checks a day — at lunch breaks or logical stopping points in your work — so you can put it out of your mind and get things done.

Out of Sight, Out of Mind

The best thing I did for myself while taking a break from social networks was to hide all the bookmarks and apps that connected me to them. This seems obvious, but I didn’t fully understand how important it was until I put it into practice: when the distraction wasn’t right in front of me, I wasn’t tempted to go look for it. Even an extra step as small as having to type “Facebook” into my browser’s address bar was enough to make me stop and decide whether that’s how I wanted to spend my time.

Don’t Check First Thing in the Morning

A lot of people have a policy of not checking email right when they wake up, and the same thing can apply to social networks. Whether you wait an hour, or wait until you’ve done a certain amount of work — for me, writing two blog posts is about right — you shouldn’t go there right away. Like email, social sites give you loads of stuff to respond to. Event invitations, wall posts about friends’ relationship drama and tweets about the coolest new web game are all great ways to kill an hour, and they can all wait until you’ve finished at least SOME work.

Try a Time Tracker

I didn’t take things this far (probably because I’m afraid to find out exactly how much time I spend not doing work) but there are some great tools out there that tell you how long you spend on various websites. RescueTime is a popular choice, but you can also try Slife or  Nebul.us.  These services will give you a stark picture of all the time you spend not working, which ought to motivate you to be more efficient.

Don’t beat yourself up over using the web to procrastinate, just be aware that you’re doing it, and adjust your habits accordingly. Good luck!

Photo Credit — escapetowisconsin

→ Leave a CommentCategories: experiments
Tagged: , ,